Book
Review/WebPages Requirements and Rubric
Using
Kozol’ book, create a series of basic WebPages that represent issues, ideas,
reflections, interpretations of the book. Develop a coherent theme and idea
that carries through with your analysis of the book and why it may be important
for other educators to know about and explore the areas your have chosen to
include. Highlight resources/connections/photographs etc that are important for
educators to access based on your ‘theme of analysis’ for this book. Are there
places to direct other educators so that they may help them act as positive
change-agents for issues raised by Kozol?
Potentially,
you could visit organizations/schools that may represent what Kozol discusses,
interview organizers/staff/educators/volunteers that are related to your topic
and ideas. You may review newspapers/magazines/journals collecting information
on the topics or investigate ideas/ places/people that Kozol discusses in the
book. What did you learn? How can you learn more? Where are places that can help to change this situation? Are
there organizations that are working to change this situation? What issues do
these organization face? Why is this an important community resource for
educators?
Your
set of WebPages should include a clear introduction, a rationale for
why you selected this organization, a short description what your site
investigates and the methodology used (how did you collect data?
interviews? newspaper articles, open meeting visit - all/any of these are
permissible), a discussion of your findings – (i.e. what issues does
this organization/school face, and any questions that arose from your research,
and links to external sites and resources about the organization).
Visit
this on-line tutorial: The
"how-to" steps to making a web page.
Requirements:
You will be assessed on ability to make a functioning set of
pages (bonus points for publishing it) and the quality of material you
‘publish’ on the pages.
|
Links |
Exemplary and functioning |
Adequate and functioning |
Not functioning, Not requisite number |
|
* Content of site * |
Exemplary |
Adequate |
Inadequate/not clear/spelling mistakes/not professional |
|
‘Style’ – has author considered context in constructing site? |
Exemplary |
Adequate |
No – linear based |
|
Graphics |
Exemplary and functioning |
Adequate and functioning |
Not functioning, Not requisite number |
|
Reflection |
Exemplary |
Adequate |
Inadequate/not clear/spelling mistakes/ |